Back to top
May 20, 2021
High performance & sustainability

The following is an update to the post originally published in January.

Since we originally wrote this post, the EPA is quickly moving forward with HFC Phase Out under the AIM Act 2020. The schedule has been accelerated by the EPA in years 2024 and 2029 (see below).  However, the HFC phase out schedule of reducing the production and consumption of HFCs by 85% by 2036 has not changed. 

The updated HFC phase out schedule is as follows:

  • 10% by 2023
  • 40% by 2024 (4 years sooner!)
  • 60% by 2029 (4 years sooner!)
  • 85% by 2036

This proposed rule initiates the following:

  • Sets the HFC production and consumption baseline levels in the U.S.
  • Establishes an initial methodology for allocating HFC allowances for 2022 and 2023.
  • Create an HFC compliance and enforcement system.

Note that American chemical manufacturers and the HVAC industry are in support of the AIM act giving the EPA authority to regulate HFCs.


The latest COVID relief bill officially started the phase down of HFC refrigerants. At Pepper, we are prepared.

drawdown-graphic
Pepper introduced these 4 drawdown strategies in 2019.

We knew big changes to our industry were on the horizon, and to prepare for those changes, in 2019, we developed Drawdown at Pepper, which identifies 4 solutions with the biggest potential impact to reduce CO2. One of the solutions is refrigerants, which has the biggest impact on both our built and natural environment.

The new legislation requires the nation’s chemical manufacturers to phase down the production and use of HFCs. American chemical companies have been among the strongest supporters of the HFC phase down. Most already manufacture the more climate-friendly HFC replacements, and a phase down would put them at a competitive advantage over manufacturers of the older technology.

The phase down approach incrementally reduces the production and consumption of HFCs by 85% by 2036 :

  • 10% reduction by 2023
  • 40% reduction by 2028
  • 70% reduction by 2033
  • 85% reduction by 2036

How we got here

Planning for the phase down started in the summer of 2015, when the EPA introduced a new rule for their SNAP program. This rule, known as rule 20, was the first step toward phasing down HFC refrigerants. However, it was based on the Clean Air Act and Montreal Protocol (countries joining forces to eliminate CFCs), which target ozone-depleting substances that contain chlorine, such as CFC and HCFC refrigerants. HFCs don't contain chlorine.

What makes HFC refrigerants harmful? Since HFC refrigerants, such as the ever popular ones like R-134a, R-404A, and R-410A, don't contain chlorine, they do NOT damage the ozone - not in the slightest. The problem with HFCs is what’s known as their Global Warming Potential (GWP), and these refrigerants have a very high GWP number, which means they are super Greenhouse Gases. The higher the GWP number, the bigger the impact on Global Warming.

There was no formal plan within the United States to phase down HFCs until what’s known as the Kigali Amendment, an addendum to the Montreal Protocol that phases down HFC refrigerants across the world and US legislation called the AIM Act. It took a few years for the AIM Act to pass the House and Senate and eventually become law, but as part of the latest COVID-19 relief/stimulus bill, we have an official plan and timeline for the phase down of HFCs.

Who is directly affected by the phase down?

The refrigeration and air conditioning industry is the main user of HFCs.

Will owners have to replace their existing equipment as part of the phase down?

No. The legislation allows consumers with existing HFC-based equipment to continue to use that equipment as they wish through its normal useful life.

Will equipment be banned in the future?

Bans on the import or manufacture of new equipment may be considered in the future, where alternative technologies are readily available. This will only be implemented following a review and further consultation with the industry.

What alternatives can replace HFCs?

Technological advancements have made it possible for new facilities to use refrigerants with very low Global Warming Potential (GWP) values today. Low GWP alternatives to HFCs consist of natural refrigerants like water, carbon dioxide, ammonia, and hydrocarbons. Additionally, the next generation of synthetic refrigerants — HFOs — are under rapid development.

Are HFC blends being phased down?

Common blends like R404A or R410A contain specific HFCs that are identified in the phase down. Allowances will be given to these specific HFC blends depending on the availability of alternate refrigerants or technologies in the marketplace.

How does this phase down impact us?

There will be no immediate change for our clients. You will not have to change your existing equipment. According to Bundled In Coronavirus Relief Bill Is Sweeping Climate Change Legislation | Here & Now (wbur.org), we are in a period of transition. Alternates are available however it takes time to get the new equipment that supports the alternate refrigerants or next generation refrigerants that are out there. This 15-year period is a time of transition.

This is why we developed Drawdown at Pepper -- to introduce these regulatory changes to our clients and partners prior to final design and equipment selection so you can base your decision on the life cycle of the system. We want to protect your investment and suggest systems that are healthier for humans and the environment.

These regulatory solutions are intended to meet urgent Climate Change initiatives. Alternative technologies and different refrigerants are already available, with more products in development. We are committed to working with our trade partners and offering our High Performance services to help you navigate these changes.

About the Author

Susan Heinking

Susan Heinking, AIA, NCARB, LEED FellowSenior Vice President, High Performance and Sustainable Construction

A licensed architect and LEED Fellow, Susan has 20 years of experience designing and managing sustainability programs and initiatives within the built environment. Susan leads the High Performance and Sustainable Construction Division at Pepper Construction Group. She applies design to action by providing tools to evaluate investments, lower costs, and achieve sustainability goals for her clients. She also designs and implements innovative solutions for the construction industry, such as the Net Zero jobsite trailer that debuted at Greenbuild 2018 and the Building Performance Tool application that quickly analyzes the ROI of design and constructability options. She is the driving force behind Pepper’s companywide carbon drawdown program, inspired by Paul Hawkins’ work "Drawdown," working towards decarbonizing the construction industry. In addition, she is currently focused on leading Pepper’s Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) initiative.

Susan is an active advocate for sustainability in Chicago and other regional markets. She has initiated and participated in many influential projects and groups, such as Chicago’s Energy Benchmarking Ordinance, the AIA2030 Chicago Working Group, Chicago’s AIA COTE, RETROFIT Chicago, the Chicago Biomimicry Group, the Illinois Green Alliance Board of Directors and the Associated General Contractors of America Environmental Steering Committee.

Currently, she serves on the Illinois Energy Conservation Advisory Council, where she uses her technical expertise in commercial buildings to advocate for energy efficiency to develop a new stretch energy code for the State. She also serves on the board of Turning Point, an organization that supports domestic violence survivors in McHenry County.

Susan holds a Master of Architecture degree from the University of Oregon and is a frequent speaker at national sustainable conventions.

Read more about Susan's accomplishments.